I spent a lot of time looking for this file for you on the Wayback Machine !
Apr May Jun
Previous capture 21 Next capture
2011 — 2012 — 2013
Internet way back machine
SEAT BELTS pt2
Last Updated on Saturday, 08 January 2011 22:07 Saturday, 17 July 2010 18:34
Nano Corner — Nano’s Corner
User Rating: /2
Life seems to be pitching curves, and they always seem to be
high and inside! Well not to long ago it seems that my life
got inside a softball game and I got one pitched underhanded!
I had decided that I was not going to register my car and
seeing that one of the other cars being used in the house
was not inspected by the state I would put my inspection
sticker on that car, leaving my car with no inspection and no
registration. As it happened one day there was no car at home
to use other than my car which had no inspection or registration.
But I thought I would just run to the store and back. On the way
I hit a stop and check. As you may expect I was asked to pull
over which I did. The officer ( good looking African type lady) ask me
for my license. To which I replied “I don’t have a license, I don’t
drive.” To which she asked “Well what do you call what your
doing now? To which I replied “I’m traveling to the store to
get something!” She just looks at me for about 20 seconds then
asked me for some I.D.! I advised her that I did have I.D. and that
I would also like to see her I.D. She was not to keen on that idea
but after some talking she said that if I give her my I.D. she will get her’s out of the car
and show it to me, so I gave her my passport. (Now I know some of
you will say that I was contracting with her at that time, and I also
was thinking that, but I know that I can stop this kind of contract at
any time, so I was not too worried.) when the officer came back to the
car she asked me to whom dose this car belong? To which I replied
this car belongs to [We’ll use the name Mtunza Malango! (translation
Gatekeeper for my people) So she asked “whats your name? And I
stated Mtunza Malango! To which she stated “So then it’s your car!”
To which I replied “No! I am not Mtunza Malango! I am the authorized
representative for Mtunza Malango!” That appeared to have the affect
of blowing a fuse, So I thought it would be a good time to ask about the
I.D. again. She just looked at me and said she was going to call the Sargent.
About 5 minutes later the Sargent comes and we start from
the beginning, the same as above but with a twist! First he states that he
is going to take me in! To which I reply you can do that but you going to
have some jurisdictional issues. Well he drop that idea right away and said
“I don’t think that you have permission to use this car and that I’m going
to tow it!” and walked away. Now I’m thinking what do I do now? Then
it hit me, he is talking about ownership! Well I got that! So I call him over
and showed him the expired registration. Which was good enough to stop
any idea about towing my car. He said a few words to the officer and got
in his car and was gone. She walks over after a bit and hands me two tickets.
The next day, In block letters I wrote on the tickets “these do not belong to
me” and mail them back. I got a letter from them stating that I should report
for a per-trail hearing. I sent them back a notarize letter stating that I was
traveling and that I would need to know by what jurisdiction they were acting
on. As one might expect I got no reply! And some how I miss that reporting
date. The next letter was not so nice it stated that a warrant would be issued
if I did not show for the next hearing. Well I had no intention on being kidnapped
by the state. So I got ready for battle I wrote the letter below (letter and tickets
to be posted on my site) and went down to meet my adversary.
I soon found out that this was a the time the sheep get a discount on their donations.
I was all ready to make my statement ” There can be no plead to that which the
dissolution is sort.” But the judge says that the prosecutor needs to talk to
you before we can proceed. When I got to see the prosecutor he said to me I see
your paperwork here, tell me how much percentage are you willing to win by?
I told him 100% ! He then asked if I would take a 80% win, to that I replied “NO”
At this time I think there was an attempt to do the Jedi mind trick because the
prosecutor leans forward in his seat and said to me “Find we do this everyday!”
To which I replied ” Great will that be all? ” By the time my trail date came I was
ready. The way I see it going to court is like a chess game. You start out on ether
side with a limited amount of moves then as the game proceeds the number of moves
becomes virtually limitless! So the thing to do is not to let it get past the opening game.
So I worked out a synopsis of what would happen in court and what to do in each
scenario. When I was called I stood up and said,
“I’m here about the account, may I enter the bar reserving my right?””
I think the prosecutor was gun shy, because he passed some papers to the judge and the next
thing I remember is the judge saying ” The prosecution has move to drop the case. And the
people agreed case dismissed!” As far as that baseball reference at the start of the story,
Well that underhanded pitch, it got knocked out of the park, home run number 2! remember
Seat Belts! (on my site : for quick access use open ID)
I will try to give more insite into my thinking about this case there.
Letter of Rotatory in the form of a
Thow shall not bear false witness against thy neighbors!
Thow shall not covet thy neighbors property nor anything that is thy neighbors!
Thow shall not lie!
In rem: relates to jurisdiction may be shown as to the subject-matter, the person, or, in proceedings in rem, as to the thing.
Res: “Property in contest, and the authority of the court to render the judgment or decree which it assumes to make.
Property: “relates the right given by the all mighty ( given to all.)”
Court : The house where the king remains with his retinue; also, the place where justice is administered.
Personam: against a person for the purpose of imposing a liability or obligation
Escheat: A reversion of property to the state in consequence of a want of any individual competent to inherit.
: End of Definitions
1. That the law of the land is the only law that can be used by the righteous.
2. This notice is to advices that I do not grant in personam jurisdiction or jurisdiction by Escheat.
3. That I will determine jurisdiction or the nature and cause of the action coming before my duly constituted court.
(This may it be subject-matter, the person, or, in proceedings in rem.)
4 I will appear to determine who has or states to have a claim against me.
5 That I am appearing under dourest and not by voluntary participation.
6 That my time is not free whereas any per-contractual or contractual forced negotiation without the want of jurisdiction, will incur a fee of $200.00 (Two hundred dollars per hour) or any part of same and $2000.00 (Two thousand dollars per hour) if incarcerated.
(Those who do not love truth, and who take pleasure in injustice, will be giver further delusions by God so they become deceived by their own lies). –2 Thess. 2:7 – 12
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.